![]() On November 17, 1994, Artmatic filed an appeal from the Max Factor and Noxell default judgments. On October 7, 1994, at oral argument, this court granted Max Factor and Noxell's motions for final judgments on their counterclaims dismissal of Artmatic's complaint with respect to them with prejudice and the award of costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees. ![]() On September 16, 1994, Max Factor and Noxell filed motions for default judgments based on Artmatic's failure to answer their counterclaims. On July 15, 1994, Max Factor and *853 Noxell answered the complaint and counter-claimed for similar relief. On June 22, 1994, Maybelline answered the complaint and counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that its products were non-infringing and that the patents in suit were invalid. A stipulation and order dated Jextended the time for defendants Max Factor and Noxell to answer to July 16, 1994. On April 18, 1994, Artmatic filed a complaint against Max Factor, Noxell, Maybelline, and others alleging patent infringement of a design for a cosmetics compact. For purposes of these motions, the relevant facts are as follows. This is a multi-party patent infringement suit. For the reasons below, Artmatic's motion to modify the default judgments is denied and Maybelline's motion for summary judgment is denied. ("Maybelline") for summary judgment based on the collateral estoppel effect of the default judgments secured by Max Factor and Noxell. This multi-defendant action for patent infringement is before the Court on two motions: (1) a motion by plaintiffs Artmatic USA Cosmetics and Arthur Matney ("Artmatic") to modify the default judgment entered against them on Octoby eliminating a declaration of patent invalidity and (2) a motion by defendant Maybelline Co. Laura Weiss, Fenster & Weiss, New City, New York, for Defendant Pavion Ltd.Īllen Winston, Winston & Winston, Rye, New York, for Defendants Zalan. ![]() Snyder, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Defendants Noxell Corp. Susan Robertson, Kirchstein, Ottinger, Israel & Schiffmiller, P.C., New York City, for Dell Laboratories, Inc. Katz, Cooper & Dunham L.L.P., New York City, for Plaintiffs Artmatic USA Cosmetics and Arthur Matney. Hauser, Walter, Conston, Alexander & Green, P.C., New York City, for Defendant Maybelline Co. ![]() Delahunty, Brooks, Haidt, Haffner & Delahunty, New York City, for Defendants Noxell Corp. MAYBELLINE CO., a DIVISION OF SCHERING PLOUGH, INC., Paris Presents, Inc., a division of Allied of Chicago, Inc., Noxell Corporation, Bonne-Bell, Inc., Almay Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Revlon Corp., Max Factor, Coty Division of Pfizer Inc., Pavion Ltd., Cosmetics & Chemical Manufacturers, Inc., Cosmair, Inc., Chesebrough Ponds, Inc., Dell Laboratories, Inc., Estee Lauder, Inc., Posner Labs, Inc., and Zalan Products Inc., Defendants. Download Artmatic 1.ARTMATIC USA COSMETICS, a DIVISION OF the ARTHUR MATNEY CO., INC. Don't worry, no mathematical skills required." Sounds - Strange, exciting sounds can be automatically generated from ArtMatic's mathematical "structures".QuickTime Movies - ArtMatic features several animation modes to render high resolution QuickTime movies.Pictures - an incredible number of stunning pictures can be created during even a short session of a few minutes.It is easy and fun to use and requires no special skills or knowledge. ArtMatic combines fractal and fractal-like images, random textures, gradients, displacements maps, and tiles in exciting ways not possible with any other product. "ArtMatic is new kind of program, an "Art Synthesizer", which makes it possible for anyone to create breathtakingly vibrant images, psychedelic animations, and even exciting new sounds. This cool piece of vintage software can create synthesized images and videos. Artmatic 1.2 released by UI Software in 1999.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |